The Role of Local Government Support and Regulation in the Development of Waste Management SMMEs: A study of the King Cetshwayo District, South Africa

Mkhwanazi S.C^*
*Correspondence: Mkhwanazi S.C, School of Built Environment and Developmental Studies, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa, Email:

Received: 24-Jul-2026, Manuscript No. AJEWM-26-19295; Editor assigned: 27-Jul-2026, Pre QC No. AJEWM-26-19295 (PQ); Reviewed: 10-Aug-2026, QC No. AJEWM-26-19295; Revised: 26-Aug-2026, Manuscript No. AJEWM-26-19295 (R); Published: 02-Sep-2026

Keywords

Local government, Waste management, SMMEs, Local economic development, Regulation, Enterprise development

Introduction

Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises (SMMEs) have become central to economic development strategies across developed and developing countries because of their ability to stimulate innovation, create employment, alleviate poverty, and promote inclusive economic growth (OECD, 2023). In South Africa, SMMEs account for a significant share of business activity and are recognised as important contributors to Local Economic Development (LED), particularly in sectors requiring labour-intensive production and service delivery (DTIC, 2024). Among the sectors, waste management has emerged as an important avenue for entrepreneurship due to increasing environmental concerns, rapid urbanisation, and growing demand for sustainable waste management systems.

Globally, governments have increasingly embraced circular economy principles that seek to minimise waste generation through recycling, reuse, resource recovery, and sustainable production systems (Kandpal et al., 2024). Waste management SMMEs play a vital role in achieving the objectives by collecting recyclable materials, processing waste streams, creating employment opportunities, and supporting environmentally sustainable development (Tereshchenko et al., 2023). Their contribution extends beyond environmental protection to include economic diversification, poverty reduction, and community development.

Seah and Addo-Fordwuor (2021), reveal that local government occupies a strategic position in supporting the development of waste management enterprises. Karsten (2022), states that South Africa's constitutional framework assigns municipalities responsibility for waste management services, environmental protection, and local economic development. Consequently, municipalities are expected to establish enabling environments through enterprise development programmes, infrastructure provision, procurement opportunities, regulatory oversight, and stakeholder collaboration (Shongwe et al., 2024). Effective municipal support enables SMMEs to improve competitiveness, access markets, comply with environmental legislation, and contribute meaningfully to the transition towards a circular economy.

Despite the expectations, many waste management SMMEs continue to experience institutional and regulatory challenges that limit their sustainability. Malope (2024), reveals that these include inadequate financial assistance, fragmented enterprise support programmes, complex procurement procedures, licensing requirements, inconsistent policy implementation, and limited access to municipal contracts. However, such challenges constrain enterprise growth and undermine municipalities' ability to realise broader local economic development objectives (Juta, 2023). Studies by Puntillo (2023) and Chen et al., (2023) have examined entrepreneurship, waste management, and local economic development independently; limited research has specifically explored how municipal support initiatives and regulatory practices influence the development of waste management SMMEs within South African municipalities. Understanding the relationships is particularly important given the increasing policy emphasis on promoting green entrepreneurship and circular economy practices.

This paper therefore examines the role of local government support and regulation in the development of waste management SMMEs in King Cetshwayo District Municipality. Specifically, it investigates municipal capacity-building initiatives, regulatory practices, and the institutional challenges experienced by waste management enterprises. The findings contribute to policy debates on strengthening municipal support systems while balancing regulatory compliance with enterprise development.

Literature Review

The role of local government in SMME development

Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises (SMMEs) are widely recognised as catalysts for economic growth, employment creation, poverty reduction, and innovation, particularly in developing economies where unemployment and inequality remain persistent challenges (OECD, 2023). In South Africa, SMMEs constitute an essential component of the economy, contributing significantly to Gross Domestic Product (GDP), job creation, and local economic development (DTIC, 2024). However, the sustainability and competitiveness of these enterprises depend largely on the institutional environment within which they operate. Consequently, local governments have become increasingly important in creating enabling conditions that facilitate entrepreneurial development and enterprise sustainability.

The concept of developmental local government, introduced through the White Paper on Local Government (Republic of South Africa, 1998), positions municipalities as key drivers of social and economic development. Beyond the traditional provision of municipal services, municipalities are expected to stimulate local economies by supporting entrepreneurship, facilitating investment, strengthening local markets, and improving access to economic opportunities. Rogerson (2022), argues that developmental local government requires municipalities to move beyond administrative functions and actively participate in enterprise development through coordinated economic interventions.

Municipal support for SMMEs encompasses a range of interventions, including business advisory services, enterprise incubation, infrastructure provision, market facilitation, procurement opportunities, networking platforms, and access to finance (Shava, 2024). These interventions help reduce barriers faced by emerging entrepreneurs while improving enterprise productivity and competitiveness. According to Kato (2024), local institutional support enhances entrepreneurial resilience by strengthening business capabilities and facilitating access to formal economic systems.

In the waste management sector, municipal support assumes even greater significance because municipalities are constitutionally responsible for waste collection, environmental protection, and sustainable development (Mashiane, 2025). Waste management SMMEs depend heavily on municipal policies, service contracts, licensing systems, and infrastructure to conduct their operations effectively. Consequently, municipalities influence not only the regulatory environment but also the availability of economic opportunities for enterprises operating within the circular economy (Bourdin and Jacquet, 2025).

Recent studies by Asencio et al., (2022) and Buratti et al., (2022) suggest that municipalities that actively invest in enterprise development programmes experience higher levels of entrepreneurial growth and improved environmental outcomes. Capacity-building initiatives such as business skills development, technical training, mentorship, and facilitated procurement have been shown to improve enterprise sustainability and enhance service delivery within local communities. Nevertheless, institutional weaknesses, fragmented support programmes, and inadequate coordination between municipal departments continue to limit the effectiveness of these interventions (Mamokhere, 2022).

Local government regulatory functions

Regulatory governance plays a fundamental role in balancing environmental protection with economic development. In the waste management sector, regulatory frameworks establish standards that promote responsible waste handling, environmental compliance, occupational safety, and sustainable resource utilisation. The regulations create legitimacy within the sector while protecting public health and ensuring environmental sustainability. However, regulatory systems may simultaneously impose administrative and financial burdens on emerging enterprises, particularly SMMEs with limited institutional capacity.

South Africa's waste management regulatory framework is primarily guided by the National Environmental Management: Waste Act (No. 59 of 2008), the National Waste Management Strategy (2020), and the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regulations. These legislative instruments seek to promote waste minimisation, recycling, environmental protection, and circular economy principles while encouraging participation by private enterprises in waste management activities. Municipalities are responsible for implementing these legislative provisions through local by-laws, licensing procedures, environmental compliance monitoring, and waste service planning.

Licensing represents one of the primary regulatory instruments affecting waste management SMMEs. Waste collection permits, transport authorisations, environmental approvals, and operational licences seek to ensure compliance with environmental standards while protecting public interests. Although these regulatory mechanisms are necessary for maintaining service quality and environmental integrity, complex licensing procedures frequently delay business establishment and increase operational costs for emerging enterprises.

Environmental compliance monitoring similarly influences enterprise performance. Municipal inspections, reporting requirements, waste classification standards, and occupational safety regulations ensure responsible waste management practices but require financial and technical resources that many small enterprises struggle to obtain. Consequently, compliance costs often become barriers to market entry, particularly for newly established businesses operating with limited capital.

Capacity building and enterprise support

Capacity building has become a cornerstone of enterprise development policies aimed at enhancing the competitiveness, sustainability, and resilience of Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises (SMMEs). Within the waste management sector, capacity building extends beyond entrepreneurial skills development to include technical training, access to finance, infrastructure provision, business incubation, mentorship, market access, and institutional support. These interventions enable enterprises to improve operational efficiency, comply with environmental regulations, adopt innovative technologies, and participate effectively in the circular economy (ILO, 2023).

Municipalities play a central role in facilitating enterprise development through Local Economic Development (LED) initiatives designed to strengthen entrepreneurial capacity. According to the Department of Cooperative Governance (COGTA, 2022), developmental municipalities are expected to support emerging enterprises by creating enabling environments that promote investment, innovation, and employment creation. Such interventions include business registration assistance, enterprise mentorship, technical advisory services, networking opportunities, and procurement support. These programmes contribute significantly to reducing barriers that often prevent small enterprises from entering and remaining competitive within formal markets.

Training programmes remain one of the most effective capacity-building interventions for waste management enterprises. Entrepreneurial training equips business owners with essential management competencies, including financial management, marketing, project management, environmental compliance, occupational health and safety, and customer relations (OECD, 2023). Technical training further enhances operational efficiency by improving knowledge of waste sorting, recycling technologies, waste recovery processes, and resource optimisation. Such skills are increasingly important as municipalities adopt circular economy strategies that require enterprises to operate within environmentally sustainable systems.

Waste management and the circular economy

The increasing global emphasis on sustainable development has shifted waste management from a predominantly disposal-oriented activity towards an integrated system that promotes resource efficiency, waste minimisation, recycling, and environmental sustainability. Central to this transformation is the concept of the circular economy, which seeks to replace the traditional linear model of production and consumption with systems that maximise resource utilisation through reuse, recycling, recovery, and regeneration (Rashid and Malik, 2023).

Unlike the conventional take-make-dispose economic model, the circular economy views waste as a valuable resource capable of generating economic, environmental, and social value. Through resource recovery and recycling activities, waste management enterprises contribute significantly to reducing landfill dependency, conserving natural resources, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and creating employment opportunities (Mishra, 2024). Consequently, waste management SMMEs have become important actors in advancing circular economy objectives while supporting inclusive local economic development.

Challenges facing waste management SMMEs

Despite the growing recognition of waste management SMMEs as contributors to local economic development, environmental sustainability, and employment creation, these enterprises continue to experience multiple institutional, financial, operational, and regulatory challenges that constrain their growth and long-term sustainability. While governments have increasingly introduced policies aimed at supporting entrepreneurship within the green economy, implementation gaps continue to undermine the effectiveness of these interventions, particularly in developing countries.

One of the most significant challenges confronting waste management SMMEs is limited access to finance. Access to adequate financial resources remains fundamental for enterprise establishment, expansion, technological innovation, and operational sustainability. However, many emerging enterprises struggle to secure funding from commercial financial institutions because they lack collateral, established credit histories, or sufficient financial records (Godfrey, 2021). Consequently, entrepreneurs frequently rely on personal savings or informal financing mechanisms that are insufficient to sustain long-term business growth.

Theoretical framework

This study is underpinned by Circular Economy Theory, which provides a conceptual framework for understanding how waste management enterprises contribute to sustainable development through resource recovery, recycling, waste reduction, and economic value creation. The circular economy has emerged as an alternative development model that challenges the traditional linear economic system characterised by the extraction, consumption, and disposal of natural resources. Instead, it promotes closed-loop production systems in which materials are continuously reused, repaired, recycled, and recovered to minimise waste generation while maximising resource efficiency (Kirchherr et al., 2017).

The theory is particularly relevant to the present study because it explains the relationship between municipal support, regulatory governance, and enterprise development. Capacity-building initiatives such as business training, financial support, infrastructure provision, and technical assistance strengthen the ability of SMMEs to participate effectively in circular economy activities. Similarly, regulatory frameworks ensure environmental compliance while promoting responsible waste management practices. However, the theory also acknowledges that excessive regulatory burdens, institutional weaknesses, and inadequate support mechanisms may undermine enterprise sustainability and reduce participation within circular economy systems.

Research methodology

This study was guided by an interpretivist paradigm and adopted a qualitative research approach. A qualitative case study design was used to explore how local government support and regulatory practices influence the development of waste management SMMEs in King Cetshwayo District Municipality. The study targeted municipal officials responsible for Local Economic Development (LED) and Environmental Management, as well as owners and managers of waste management SMMEs operating within the district.

A purposive sampling technique was employed to select participants with direct knowledge and experience of municipal support programmes, waste management operations, and regulatory processes. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, which provided participants with the opportunity to share their experiences while allowing the researcher to probe emerging issues relevant to the study objectives. The collected data were analysed using thematic analysis, following the procedures proposed by Braun and Clarke (2021). The analysis involved familiarisation with the interview transcripts, coding, identification of recurring patterns, and development of themes related to municipal capacity-building initiatives, regulatory governance, and challenges affecting waste management SMMEs.

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the University of KwaZulu-Natal Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee. Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Confidentiality and anonymity were maintained throughout the research process.

Discussion

The findings reveal that local government capacity-building initiatives play a significant role in supporting the development of waste management SMMEs within the King Cetshwayo District. Participants consistently described municipalities as providing institutional, technical and resource-based support aimed at strengthening entrepreneurial capacity and promoting participation in sustainable waste management. Capacity-building initiatives extended beyond financial assistance to include business registration, training, infrastructure provision, operational resources and integration into formal waste management systems. Collectively, these interventions were perceived as contributing to enterprise development while advancing local economic development and circular economy objectives.

Participant 1 explained that municipalities provide structured support to local recyclers through a range of capacity-building initiatives, including the establishment of recycler databases, training programmes and access to operational resources:

“Local recyclers are assisted with the following: Development of a local recyclers database; facilitation of capacity-building workshops in partnership with the private and public sector (government departments); provision of resources: refuse bags, operational space, transportation and access to water and electricity; opening and registration of companies.” (P1)

The participant's response illustrates that municipal support extends beyond conventional financial assistance by addressing the institutional and operational needs of emerging enterprises. The provision of operational resources, infrastructure and business registration support demonstrates an integrated approach to enterprise development that enables SMMEs to participate more effectively in the waste management sector. Such interventions contribute to the formalisation of waste enterprises while strengthening their operational capacity. These findings support Shava (2024), who argues that developmental local government should create enabling environments through coordinated institutional support rather than focusing solely on service delivery.

Similarly, Participant 2 highlighted that municipalities support local recyclers and vendors through infrastructure provision, funding, skills development and integration into broader waste management programmes.
“Municipalities promote local recyclers and vendors by offering land, funding, buildings and training for skills development. In Mthonjaneni Local Municipality, stalls were built in the central town for local vendors, and funding was given to vendors in townships. This also enforced compliance through the issuance of permits and rezoning in Mthonjaneni, integration of SMEs into EPR systems, with local government facilitating access to materials and PRO support. Municipalities' integrated waste management plans also included LED initiatives to minimise waste as a priority in the implementation plan. This would also benefit service providers to get involved.” (P2)

This finding demonstrates that municipal support is increasingly integrated within broader local economic development and environmental governance strategies. The inclusion of SMMEs within Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) systems and integrated waste management plans reflects a growing recognition of waste management enterprises as strategic partners in advancing circular economy initiatives. By facilitating access to land, infrastructure and market opportunities, municipalities create conditions that enable local entrepreneurs to contribute to both economic development and environmental sustainability. This finding corroborates Godfrey (2021), who contends that municipalities play a critical role in strengthening recycling enterprises through supportive institutional arrangements that encourage participation in resource recovery activities.

Participants further indicated that municipal support includes mentorship, technical assistance and access to municipal contracts, all of which contribute to enterprise sustainability. Participant 3 explained:
“Local governments support SMMEs in sustainable waste management through several initiatives: Municipal contracts for collection, litter-picking, and recycling provide stable work; Integration of small recyclers and waste-pickers into formal systems; training and mentorship for "waste preneurs" on business skills and compliance; grants and financial support to upgrade equipment and expand operations; technical support and planning frameworks from SALGA and municipalities enable SME participation; and promotion of circular economy practices like reuse, recycling, and composting for informal operators...” (P3)

The findings suggest that capacity building should not be viewed as a once-off intervention but rather as an integrated process combining technical knowledge, institutional support and market access. Municipal contracts, mentorship programmes and technical guidance enable SMMEs to improve business performance while enhancing compliance with environmental legislation. These findings resonate with the circular economy perspective, which emphasises collaboration between government institutions and private enterprises in creating sustainable resource recovery systems (Kirchherr et al., 2017).

Participant 10 further demonstrated that local government support has evolved towards more comprehensive programmes aimed at promoting green entrepreneurship within the district.

“To support small and medium enterprises in adopting sustainable waste management, the local and provincial governments have moved toward a ‘Circular economy’ framework... The district SMME and cooperatives grant... Equipment procurement... Training and capacitation... Buy-back centre integration... The green fund... District Development Model (DDM) ‘One plan’...” (P10)

This finding reflects an emerging policy shift in which waste is increasingly recognised as an economic resource capable of generating employment, stimulating entrepreneurship and supporting inclusive local economic development. The introduction of targeted grant programmes, buy-back centres and district-level planning initiatives demonstrates a commitment to creating a more supportive ecosystem for waste management enterprises. Such interventions are consistent with South Africa's National Waste Management Strategy, which promotes enterprise development as a key mechanism for advancing the circular economy (DFFE, 2020).
Notwithstanding the positive initiatives, participants also highlighted inconsistencies in the implementation of municipal support programmes. Participant 6 succinctly stated:

“None at this stage.” (P6)

Although brief, this response is significant because it emphasises disparities in the availability of municipal support across local municipalities within the district. The findings therefore suggest that while comprehensive policy frameworks and support programmes exist, their implementation remains uneven due to differences in institutional capacity, resource availability and administrative commitment. Consequently, the benefits of municipal capacity-building initiatives are not experienced equally by all waste management SMMEs. Similar concerns have been raised by Rogerson (2022), who argues that the effectiveness of local economic development interventions depends largely on municipal institutional capacity and the ability to translate policy commitments into practical support for entrepreneurs. The findings demonstrate that local government capacity-building initiatives constitute an important foundation for the development of waste management SMMEs. However, the sustainability of the initiatives depends on consistent implementation, adequate resource allocation, and stronger coordination among municipalities, provincial departments, and enterprise support institutions. Strengthening these institutional arrangements will not only enhance the competitiveness of waste management SMMEs but also contribute to achieving broader local economic development and circular economy objectives.

Recommendations

Policy recommendations:

• Municipalities should strengthen policies that promote local procurement from waste management SMMEs.

• Regulatory procedures should be simplified to reduce administrative burdens on emerging enterprises.

• The government should expand financial support mechanisms tailored to waste management entrepreneurs.

Institutional recommendations:

• Municipal departments responsible for LED and environmental management should improve coordination.

• Municipalities should establish dedicated support units for waste management SMMEs.

• Partnerships with financial institutions, private sector organisations, and development agencies should be strengthened.

Practical recommendations for municipalities and SMMEs:

• Regular training programmes should be provided to improve business management and regulatory compliance.

• Municipalities should create accessible information platforms for funding and procurement opportunities.

• SMMEs should strengthen record-keeping, financial management, and compliance systems to improve access to support programmes.

Conclusion

This study examined the role of local government support and regulation in the development of waste management SMMEs in King Cetshwayo District Municipality. The findings indicate that municipal capacity-building initiatives, including training, business development support, infrastructure assistance, and procurement facilitation, contribute positively to enterprise sustainability. However, challenges such as limited funding, bureaucratic administrative processes, fragmented stakeholder collaboration, and complex regulatory requirements continue to constrain enterprise growth. The study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on local economic development, waste management entrepreneurship, and circular economy governance by demonstrating the importance of balancing regulatory oversight with practical enterprise support. Future research could examine the long-term effectiveness of municipal support programmes and compare waste management SMME experiences across different municipalities in South Africa.

References

1. Asencio HD, Prager F, Martínez JN, Tamura J (2022). The impact of local government economic development programs on city-level entrepreneurial activity: Evidence from Southern California. J Entrep Public Policy. 11:112-134.

   [Google Scholar]

2. Bourdin S, Jacquet N (2025). Closing the loop at the local scale: Investigating the drivers of and barriers to the implementation of the circular economy in cities and regions. Ecol Econ. 231:108542.

   [Google Scholar]

3. Braun V, Clarke V (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publication.

   [Google Scholar]

4. Buratti N, Sillig C, Albanese M (2022). Community enterprise, community entrepreneurship and local development: A literature review on three decades of empirical studies and theorisations. Entrep Reg Dev. 34:376-401.

   [Google Scholar]

5. Chen X, Qi Y, Wang K, Xing L (2023). Does farmer entrepreneurship promote willingness to participate in domestic waste management? An empirical analysis from China. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. 25:2037-2048.

   [Google Scholar]

6. Department of Cooperative Governance (COGTA) (2022). Local economic development policy framework. Pretoria: Government Printer.
7. Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE) (2020). National waste management strategy 2020. Pretoria: Government Printer.
8. Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) (2024). SMME development report. Pretoria: Government Printer.
9. Godfrey L (2021). Waste management and the circular economy in South Africa. S Afr J Econ Manag. 28:45–58.
10. International Labour Organisation. (2023). Enterprise development and green jobs report. Geneva: ILO.
11. Juta LB (2023). Local economic development in South African municipalities: Prospects and challenges. J Afr Stud Dev. 023:153.

    [Google Scholar]

12. Kandpal V, Jaswal A, Santibanez Gonzalez ED, Agarwal N (2024). Circular economy principles: Shifting towards sustainable prosperity. In Sustainable energy transition: Circular economy and sustainable financing for Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) practices (pp. 125-165). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

    [Google Scholar]

13. Karsten ASJ (2022). Local government accountability in South Africa: An environmental law reading (Doctoral dissertation, North-West University (South Africa)).

    [Google Scholar]

14. Kato AI (2024). Building resilience and sustainability in small businesses enterprises through sustainable venture capital investment in sub-Saharan Africa. Cogent Econ Finance. 12:2399760.

    [Google Scholar]

15. Kirchherr J, Reike D, Hekkert M (2017). Conceptualising the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resour Conserv Recycl. 127:221–232.

    [Google Scholar]

16. Malope CRM (2024). Public procurement challenges faced by Small, Medium, and Micro Enterprises (SMMEs) Intshwane Metropolitan Municipality (Master's thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (South Africa).

    [Google Scholar]

17. Mamokhere J (2022). Understanding the complex interplay of governance, systematic, and structural factors affecting service delivery in South African Municipalities. Commonwealth Youth Dev. 20.

    [Google Scholar]

18. Mashiane KF (2025). Critical legal perspective on the interplay of solid waste management and human rights in South Africa: Lessons from Kenya and England (Doctoral dissertation).
19. Mishra D (2024). Sustainability in solid waste management to reduce environmental impact and improve resource efficiency. Int J Res Rev Appl Sci Humanit Technol. 67-75.

    [Google Scholar]

20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2023). Financing SMEs and entrepreneurs 2023. Paris: OECD Publishing.
21. Puntillo P (2023). Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 30:941-954.

    [Google Scholar]

22. Rashid S, Malik SH (2023). Transition from a linear to a circular economy. In Renewable energy in circular economy (pp. 1-20). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    [Google Scholar]

23. Republic of South Africa (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Pretoria: Government Printer.
24. Republic of South Africa (1998). White Paper on Local Government. Pretoria: Government Printer.
25. Rogerson CM (2022). Local economic development in South Africa: Current challenges and prospects. Dev South Afr. 39:567–582.
26. Seah S, Addo-Fordwuor D (2021). Roles and strategies of the local government in municipal solid waste management in Ghana: Implications for environmental sustainability. World Environ. 11:26-39.
27. Shava E (2024). Local government and enterprise development in South Africa. J Local Gov Res. 16:22–37.
28. Shongwe MA, Lukhele TM, Zulu HP (2024). Exploring the factors of enabling environments for business investment projects in rural communities: Stakeholders’ perspectives. Front Sustain Cities. 6:1467635.
29. Tereshchenko E, Happonen A, Porras J, Vaithilingam CA (2023). Green growth, waste management, and environmental impact reduction success cases from small and medium enterprises context: A systematic mapping study. IEEE Access. 11:56900-56920.

    [Google Scholar]

30. Zhang J, Adu Sarfo P, Adjorlolo G, Appiah A, Nyantakyi G, Bonzo JK, et al. (2026) Leveraging knowledge sharing for circular economy practices in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs): A pathway to achieving SDGs in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Enterp Inf Manag. 39(1):87-115.

    [Google Scholar]